|
So finally,
to the cars with the wheels sticking out, and those that are generally
a little less suited for dual purpose use, especially in the weather
conditions prevailing over the two days of the test. That said, the
DAX was the exception to the rule, and the wet might have even been
a good time to try John Cellier's DAX four-wheel-drive V8. Quite apart
from the lunacy of inserting all this hardware into something of Westfield
dimensions, the quality of Cellier's handiwork was breathtaking and
deserves a full feature all to itself. For me, the fact that he did
almost everything except the welding himself and could produce work
of this quality from within the confines of an ordinary garage - in
addition to the thought behind the method - was enough to qualify for
star status. If you need convincing, just look at the bonnet scoop and
sidescreens which were formed with aluminium sheet and a hammer over
a wooden former, or the heater system, which uses a Sierra central locking
motor to operate the air flap. Unfortuately though, for our purposes,
it was not really a track day car. John hadn't built it as such - although
after a few laps you could easily see how a few changes could turn it
into one.
The basis
is a DAX variation on the Westfield/Caterham theme which normally features
the entire Sapphire Cosworth 4X4 engine, transmission and drive-train
crammed within those dimensions. Except in this case Cellier wanted
a V8, so DAX made him sign a disclaimer absolving them of all responsibility.
They need not have worried. The V8 is a 3.9-litre Rover with a bottom
end by specialist John Eales with Cellier-fettled heads and a remapped
Range Rover injection system which churns out about 300bhp and drives
through a Cosworth 4x4 Ford MT75 gearbox which rattles with a vengeance
on the overrun despite a professional rebuild. Brakes are a mixture
of vented V6 4x4 fronts discs and claipers and vented Coswroth 4x4 rears.
|
|
The
Venue
Anglesey
or Ty Croes, as we know it, first opened to the public in July
1997 after it was returned to the Bodorgan Estate following nearly
50 years of army occupation. Unlike most UK tracks on ex-military
land (usually because they were used as airbases), Ty Croes has
slopes and inclines which test driver skill to the limit - a welcome
chage from circuits which are flat and rather featureless.
Just
over a mile long, it's a tricky little place to drive. Tight and
twisty places usually are, not because they require bravery, but
for exactly the opposite reason. Slow corners are always the most
difficult - both in repsect of car set-up, and for the driver
- and even when you have an optimum chassis, it is all too easy
to ruin a good lap by trying too hard. Anglesey is also difficult
becasue the crucial (and only) fast bit at the circuit's western
end is sequence where (as is often the case), the preceding bit
determines how effective you are through the next part - here
it is made more difficult by a steep ridge running north to south.
Tidiness at Ty Croes is everything, and if you start getting scrappy
and overdriving the car, the lap times will just escalate. A good
tour requires both discipline and patience.
|
|
|
|
The
main problem I had was fitting in (no change there) but in this case
it was practical rather than social because hands hit legs within a
half turn of lock and because for some reason the clutch pedal was way
higher than the rest. This meant you couldn't push the left leg froward
and move the thigh from the wheel rim. On track, the suspension was
very soft - especially the damping - and the car would gently float
like a boat on a wave, then if you weren't careful committing the car
to the bend, the rear end would rear up and slew into oversteer. It
was a surprise, given the lazy nature of the car and yet quite gentle
but needing a correction which the ergonomics wouldn't allow. That said,
if you were careful not to let this happen and gently tweaked the car
into the turn, you could then power on and the car would simply track
through the bend with all 300bhp working to the max and without pushing
wide at the nose - which most 4WD cars do. The engine was nice too,
in a gentle sort of way. It seemed to make no difference what revs you
used because the power felt very similar throughout the range, and it
reached its 6000rpm litmit in no time. Meanwhile, because each bank
of cylinders has its own exhaust box, you heard more of one than the
other, and max sounded like half speed. All of which was in keeping
with the car's nature - if not with its appearance, which has promised
fireworks.
|
|
Which
brings us to the SBD Westfield and the Caterham R500. the fastest
of the group mainly because they are the least compromised for
track use, but then they are also the least suited for the road
and both were trailered to the event - though at a pinch they
have been driven. The Westfields's owner, Martin Bailey, was not
present, but to oversee proceedings SBD engine man Dick Hulbert
was there. He revealed that the 1.6-litre Vauxhall's otherwise
standard cylinder head had been fitted with a set of very mild
cams, and the standard valves and single springs had a set of
Titanium caps. Pistons were standard too (with pockets cut for
the valves), and so was the bottom end - although there was a
dry sump lubrication system. Obvious addition was the set of four
aggressive-looking tapered throttle bodies which are managed by
an MBE management system, all of which helps liberate 185bhp at
about 8000rpm.
The
gearbox is a Ford MT75 Sierra five-speed equipped with just four
dog-engaged Quaife ratios and the chassis is standard Westfield
with independent double-wishbone rear round an Escort Cosworth
differential and double-jointed driveshafts. At the front is SBD's
variation on the wide track double-wishbone set-up similar to
that which appeared on the V8-engined Westfield of the early 1990s.
It's all beautifully done, as is the cockpit with its very deep
unpadded race seat and minimal aero screens. After that, it's
a bit of a strange cocktail. Dick and his helpers fetched a huge
lorry battery from their trailer which was then plugged in to
fire up the car. It does have an on-board source and having stalled
the engine, I do know it will fire up, but apparently it won't
do it repeatedly. Then the throttle pedal was so heavy that at
first I feared to tread on it in case there was problem and I
broke something in the linkage. Not so, it was meant to be like
that. Once on track, you forgot about it (except when trying to
heel and toe) and took pleasure from the engine which pulled well
from low enough in the range that four speeds in the box would
probably never be a problem, and which soulnded like a real racer
all the way up to its 8500 limt. The shift was slick too and never
crunched, and because the gate was wide and had only four slots
you just flicked the lever across the gate as fast as you liked
without thinking about it.
|
|
|
 |
And
then to complement that, the handling was great and the balance
excellent. You could take more speed into the very fast School
corner than in anything else and then hit the power hard all
the the way through while you kept it balanced with the tiniest
amount opposite lock. And what made it especially easy was the
way the chassis stayed nicely flat all the the time and didn't
pitch and rock - exactly what knocks your confidence in very
fast corners, and also gives the tyres more to deal with. But,
despite this general excellance on the track, and its great
little engine and box, there are several big buts about this
car. Apart from the accelerator pedal, which should be fixed,
the oil temperature headed inevitably towards 120deg C within
five laps - or just as I was working to the max - so it definitely
needs a better oil cooler. The tyres were Avon slicks with s
simple cut tread pattern on nine or ten-inch rims, which are
definitely not road legal and would bave improved the handling
on almost any of the other cars at the test. Plus, why not have
a bigger battery. If you stall out on the track for any reason,
you might need a tow back to the pits, which is never popular
with your fellow track day-ers, finally, why the (undoubtedely
impressive) effort with a 1600cc engine when there are no capacity
classes at a track day, and when an almost standard 2-litre
will give about the same.
The
answer is that the car was a bit of a joint effort between Bailey
and SBD's Steve Broughton, built to provide a showcase for various
components, one of which was the kit of parts for the 1600 Vauxhall
engine which, Broughton points out, is lighter and in unmodified
form, cheaper than the older 2-litre Vauxhall which is now getting
quite scarce. To duplicate the motor in Bailey's car would cost
about £5500 fully overhauled and complete with dry sump
and ingection, so it's a fair arguement. The car, Broughton
reckons, has involved a lot of special effort suit the owner
but to build one similar would cost somewhere between £25-30,000
depending on the number of goodies, but complete and ready to
run, and incorporating all the suspension modifiactions which
seemed to work so well.
|
|
|
So,
the Westfield has to go in a class by itself - partly because
of its performance, but also because it can't strictly be compared
with the rest, which are 100 per cent genuine road-going cars.
But there's a little bit of that about Jason Krebs' Caterham R500
too, but because Caterham do incline the head towards road usabilty
a masochist could at least have driven it though the freezing
winds and lashing rain to reach our test. Krebs is no longer bothered
about that, and admits to buying the R500 because he saw it as
the ultimate in its category, but he also admits to being "too
competitive" to limit his use solely to track days, so he
does race the car. He has also spent a great deal of time and
money in search of more performance. The standard R500 is petty
well specified with (in road trim with silencer) 220bhp from the
K-series and a Caterham designed six speed gearbox, but Krebs
has ported the head, installed larger inlet valves and a different
exhaust cam, Omega pistons, a full Motec M800 'wasted spark' sequential
injection engine management with full track map and datalog facility,
an Apollo de-aeration tower for the dry sump oil tank and a modified
airbox with extra air inlets to complement the special silencer
which he specified and which was made by BTB. This lot - from
which there can't have been much change from £10,000 - pushed
out 256bhp at 8700 and 167lb ft of torque at 7300rpm. Or, quite
a lot from a 1.8-litre engine.
The
most pleasing thing according to Jason, is that it will do it
all with the track day-legal silencer (one which he tried during
his research lost 18bhp) and the extra grunt, he reckons, was
the only way to deal with the aerodynamics of a Caterham once
you start getting up to three figure speeds (well, that's his
excuse anyway). The engine drives through a Quartermaster twin-plate
five-inch clutch and the Caterham six-speeder with uprated first
and third gears to a Suretrac '2002 race spec' slipper diff, and
is cooled via a triple bypass radiator with electric pump. There
is a 65-litre fuel tank installed for the 10 mile races where
refuelling is not allowed, while on the chassis side there is
a full rollcage, bigger rear brakes, the option of three different
front ani-roll bars and a set of Bilstein dampers ( the biggest
difference to the handling - says Krebs). Tyres are ACB10 Avons
for the dry on standard R500 6-inch front, 7-inch rear magnesium
wheels with CR500s for the wet and slicks for the occasional track
day - although not this one.
|
|
|
|
But is
it all worth it? There's no doubting the power which is very quiet,
smooth and impressive and the lack of temperament. The engine works
best up at the top (Jason uses over 9000, but I tried not to) bit it
will pull from lower down without coughing or stuttering. The problem
though, was the chassis. The power would light up the rear wheels in
third (and sometimes fourth) usually just at the apex of the corner,
and then the chassis would both squat and lurch. In this case, I agree
with Phil that for the sort of car it was, it was too soft, especially
as when the rear end bit again because you had backed off, the extra
bounce from the chassis made it difficult to keep your line. The softness
in the spring and damping - or maybe the geometry - meant it was far
too pich sensitve and application either of power or brakes rocked the
chassis and agains made difficult to place on the road. Familiaritu,
according Jason, means he doesn't worry about this so much and feels
confident to lean on it harder through the very fast corners, but I
still think I'd rather see if it could be sorted.
Why? Well,
because if you try and keep it all smooth (which is my preference) and
get the car settled neatly by braking that little bit earlier, the front
end pushes wide - something which was also true of the standard R500
which we tried here but I don't remember that being so sensitive in
pitch. All of which begs the question, has Krebs chosen the wrong route,
or is that as good as it gets? Hard to say without a proper test which
was not the object of the two days, but although this was the quickest
of our group, another 40bhp at a track where the aerodynamics don't
matter so much, should have found more than three-quarters of a second
over the standard car, especially as that didn't have the benefit of
ACB10 tyres. On the plus side, Jason is a self-confessed fiddler and
has a car which will allow him to do that. It is definitely quick enough
to thrill and is also compliant with several sets of race regulations.
Forty grand plus is a lot of money for a car for track days but if you
get a competitve racer out of it as well it sounds like better value.
|
 |
TESTER'S
VIEW by Phil Bennett
To
some people a Caterhaam is the real thing with a direct link to
the original Se7en. For me a Caterham is just an expensive Westfield
and I'm sorry but I just can't understand anyone who spends over
£30K on a R500 (perhaps they need an expensive girlfriend
to quell their spendthrift ways!) The R500 was very quick but
I think the power exceeded the ability of the chassis . It was
difficult to place on the road, was too softly set up - even after
the owner increased the high speed bump on the damper - and the
brakes weren't very good. It is a super quick car - quick enough
to make you grin- and in a straight line was the quickest thing
on the test. However it is a quasi-race car with an all-up cost
of over £40K and big money engine rebuilds after a few thousand
kms. And for me it misses the point. Fun factor eight then, but
then minus eight because it ain't much fun spending over £30K
on an R500 then another £12K on the motor upgrade - and
then another few grand more in engine rebuilds.
The
Westfield was a different story. It was easily the best balanced
car on the track and the speed you could carry into corners reminded
me of a single-seater. Understeer on the limit could be remedied
by perhaps more front camber but nevertheless is was simply fanastic.
SBD has done a great job with the motor and the set-up - if you
have a Westfield you should pay these guys a visit. Not only that
but the preparation was fantastic - it was race car clean. Only
the feel of the throttle pedal let it down (too stiff). But again
I think this car misses the point.
|
|
|
No windscreen
and the need for a 'jump' battery to get the thing started - you have
to ask the question for the £20,000 plus this thing costs why
not buy a proper racing car? If you have to go through all this fuss
get an old Formula Three or a Supersport Mallock and experience real
speed.
The Dax
was a different kettle of fish altogether. This was the car I was most
looking foward to driving because on paper these things really look
the business - light weight with a big motor and four-wheel-drive...
But the driving experience was totally different to the expectation.
As I pulled away down the straight I felt like I was in a 1920s' Bentley.
With an almost GT quality to the steering , gearbox and seat - all built
for comfort rather than speed - it was difficult to hussle it around
what is s tight little track. And all of this wasn't helped by a clutch
pedal set way too high and springing that was too stiff. This is undoubtedly
a great road car, and looks superb, but it's no track machine.
|
|
Tech
Analysis
|
|
Cornering
speeds (mph)
|
| Corner |
Westfield |
Caterham |
Dax |
| School |
86.3 |
86.3 |
75.8 |
| Abbotts |
56.6 |
56.0 |
47.5 |
| Hill
Rise |
78.9 |
79.4 |
75.0 |
| Radar |
52.9 |
53.0 |
51.0 |
| Hairpin |
35.2 |
35.5 |
31.7 |
| Douglas |
67.5 |
66.3 |
63.8 |
|
| |
| Make/Model |
SBD
Westfield |
Caterham
R500 |
Dax
Rush V8 |
| Engine |
SB
Developments Vauxhall 1.6XE 16v engine. Throttle bodies MBE Systems
ECU |
1800cc
K-series with steel bottom end, big valve head, racing QED flywheel,
freer flowing induction system.. |
4-litre
Rover V8 with balnced rods/crank/pistons, Real Steel cam, ported
& polished head, other mods |
| Transmission |
Quaife
4-speed Pro box, LSD |
Caterham
6-speed gearbox with LSD |
4WD
Ford MT75 gearbox |
| Suspension |
SBD-designed
double wishbones front, multi link Westfield rear |
Double
wishbones with Eibach springs & Eibach adjustable dampers |
Double
wishbones with single coil springs over monotube dampers |
| Brakes |
Wilwood
4-pot piston calipers front 2-pots rear, Ford discs |
Front:4
pot AP vented discs. Rear: Caterham Race 2 pot vented |
Front:standard
Sierra 4x4. Rear:vented Sierra Cosworth |
| Wheels |
Image
3-piece alloy rims |
Magnesium
alloys 6-inch front 7 rear |
BBS
RS split rims (7x15/8x15) |
| Tyres |
Avon
cut slicks |
Avon
ACB10 |
195x45R15
Toyo Proxes T1-S |
| Max
Power |
191bhp@8000rpm |
256bhp@8700rpm |
not
known |
| Max
Torque |
133lb.ft@7000rpm |
167lb.ft@7300rpm |
not
known |
| Lap
Time |
48.08
seconds |
47.50
seconds |
52.05
seconds |
| Top
Speed |
109.5
mph |
109.7
mph |
104.7
mph |
| Supplied
by |
SB
Developments |
Jason
Krebs |
John
Cellier |
| Comments |
Race
car grip that goes on forever. But why not buy a real race car? |
Staggering
power. Goes where it's pointed. Too much for chassis? |
Surperb
craftmanship. Built for comfort rather than speed. Road car. |
| Overall
Rating |
4/5 |
4/5 |
3/5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBD
Motorsport Ltd, Unit 15, Red Lion Business Park, Red Lion Road, Surbiton,
Surrey. KT6 7QD. Tel: 0208 391 0121.
|
|
|